2011年11月15日星期二

Cancer and the Useless Poisonous Cures

most cancers affected individuals are mattered to a barrage of state-of-the-art medical remedys -- surgical operation, chemdifferentapy, radidifferentapy, hormonal treatment, and the like. How efficient are those? Like in on line casino playing -- many consumers attempted their good fortrackand a few win however many additionalmisplaced. on the tip of the day, the winside is the established order! do not get me flawed. The "industry" of curing cancer does produce wintry weatheriors. Some curhiattainproachs of remedy are very helpful and lifestyles-saving. however more oftensome remedys are only outrightbad, if we care to lookayor know what had actually occured.

A evaluate of medical literature turns out to signify that CHEMdifferentAPY -- the U.S.e of cytotoxic medicinefor killing cancer cells within the body, seems to many writers are "barbaric", even asdifferents really feel thon they don't seem to be efficient in any respect.

the preferred mag in Germany, Der Spiegel of four October two hundredfour , had a piece of writing enidentifyd: "rewardkur ohne Nutzen" translated as "the U.S.emuch less toxic treatments." the thing mentioned that "more and more refined and costly cell poisons are being supplyn to noticeably ill affected individuals ... affected individuals don't in fact reside an afternoon longer."

Wolfgang Wrasidlo, director of drug construction, Scripps medical institution, La Jolla, California used to be quoted to have shelp: "eachbody is aware of that our present cancer drugsare awful."

Barry Sears, creator of input the Zone wrote: "the prevailing remedys for cancer are one of the crucial barbaric in modernmedication."

Dr. Jeffrey Tobias, medical director of the Meyerstein Institute of Oncology, united kingdom, (in the e-book: Cancer) ssupport: "it's ... unexpectedhow continuously the rule of thumb of: first do no hurt is forget aboutd". once in a while oncologists use chemdifferentapy indiscriminately with "no justification as opposed to the physician's desire to take actionmething." Such commentary is certainly nerve-racking. Does it mean that previously and even now, chemdifferentapy has been used on affected individuals indiscriminately?

Dr. Uwealthy Abel, an eminent German professor on the Universit downy of Heidelberg finishd that:

(in Der Spiegel threethree:1seventy four-1seventy six. 1ninety ninezero): "for variounited statess of late's commonplace castcancer, the onlys that result in ninety%of the cancer loss of lifes annually -- breast, lung, colon, rectum, pores and skin, resider, pancreatic and bladder --chemdifferentapy hasn't ever been proved to do any goodin any respect."

Dr. Ralph Moss, fireplace d from the Memorial Smortgage-Kettering Cancer heart for informing the reality, has written books and lots ofarticles on chemdifferentapy - e.g., querying Chemdifferentapy, Cancer trade , and so forth. in line with Dr. Moss "chemdifferentapy regularlydoesn't cure cancer or exgenerally tfinishlife. It doesn't strengthen the fashionableof affected person's life both. to the contrary it may well "nice ly lower the typicalof life."

Albert Braverman, a professionalfessor of oncology on the State college of recent York, u.s.a., wrote: "Many medical oncologists recommendchemdifferentapy for only about any tumour, with a desirefulness undisbravenessd by way of additionally much invariable screw ups" (Lancet, April 19ninety one.threethree7:ninety1).

Johan Bjorksten from the college of Wisconsin, united states, wrote: "Chemdifferentapy on my own ruins the immune machine past some degree ... which building ups the riskfor early loss of life from an infections and diffehirecancers in those immunocommon senseally bare people." (in J. Bjorksten, JAB Pulb., 1ninety seveneight, pg. 22, Charleston, S.C).

Dr. wealthbackyard Etrucks (in his book: The Cancer holidaythrough you might have by no means Heard Of) wrote: "affected individuals will have to recollect that chemdifferentapy is of little beclose to e compatible for ... casttumors. annually thounited statesnds of individuals undergotoxic negative effects ... and obtain little, if any, benehave compatibility."

Dr. W. John Diamond & mates, writing about typical medical remedy for cancer shelp: "The so-known as good fortrackof typical cancer remedy is sometimesphantasmary. there is not any conclusive ... proof or data demonstscore long term luckful end resultsor explanation whyable charges of releave outions to adornthose follows."

Dr. John Lee & pals wrote (of their book: What Your physician won't inform you About Breast Cancer): "Some chemdifferentapy does extend life for a few months, however typically on the topworthof dehugconsuming unwanted side effects. the united statese of chemdifferentapy is onlya raffle... occasionally it really works, from time to time it doesn't and seldom it makes issues worse."

In the sunshine of the above feedback by more than a few mavens i think that maycer affected individuals wish to emenergy themselves. In the identify of honest ness, i think that anybody who's to go through any invasive remedy processs any suchs chemdifferentapy will must be supplied with enough and honest data just sohe could have the ability to make a decision for himself what's easiest for him. sadly, many affected individuals who got here to peer us were left ignorant or greatly unacutely aware of whon they were in for -- the cardforums weren't lassist out for them. on instancethey were even misinshaped.

with nony disrespect to somebody or profession, i've to indicate that one much wanted step that must be taken is to are trying to findthe reality in regards to the present remedys for cancer. allow us to followall of the rewire s to be had and permit us to ask those querys and locatehonest, independent resolution s. For all of thesurgical treatment, chemdifferentapy, radidifferentapy (and diffehiremedicine) which have been administered to impacted individuals:

1. what number of affected individuals have been cured?

2. what number of have beclose to e compatibleed from the remedys?

three. What are the advantagesand at what cost?

four . what number of died?

5. what number of continue to existd after one, two, three, 5 or ten yrs after the remedys?

6. what number of siffered metastases of the are livingr, bone, lungs, and the like.?

7. Is there any correlation wagerween the remedys they gained and the metastases that passed off?

sadly, this kind ofnswers stay elusive and not approaching. The technique to stay on this profitablecancer-remedy-industry is to be as non-devotetal with the true tips -- be as obscure and amlargeuropean ous as imaginable along with hanging up a fake entrance of "I-know-all" picture.

"You affected individuals don't ask too many querys. i'm the person who know easiest and also you simply follow my orders."

permit me finishwith this citation:

"None are so blind as individuals who've esure and realizenot;

and none are so deaf as those whohave ears and listen to not."

没有评论:

发表评论